Unfixed bugs of vanilla game, Send them here if you find any |
The Black Wyrm's Lair Terms of Use | Help Search Members Calendar |
Unfixed bugs of vanilla game, Send them here if you find any |
Jun 10 2007, 05:26 PM
Post
#81
|
|
Retired team member Tactical reputation: 2 Posts: 177 Joined: 5-April 06 From: Greece |
Sikret if you remove both PI and Simulacrum from the game pure Arcane spell-casters are penalized too much. If you decide to implement a summoning spell then IMO: a) It should be "gated". b ) It should have high physical resistances (at least 50% but no MR since Nishruu and Hakeashar are enough). c) Good THACO,AC and at least 2 ApR. Giving the above abilities to the Elite Djinni seems a good idea to me. Another idea maybe could be to make an improved version of the Tenser's Transformation spell. The same abilities of TT+ the ability for the Mage to cast 1-4 level spells. This could be a spell useful to pure Mages and not overpowered for a 8 level spell. Besides it replaces better the Simulacrum spell. |
|
|
Jun 10 2007, 10:33 PM
Post
#82
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 137 Joined: 11-March 07 |
Thetruth speaks the truth, whereas project image is cheesy and bugged for a large percentage of the game, simlacrum only really becomes an issue right at the end. I wouldn't recommend changing it.
However, if we are going to change it, improved tenser's transformation would be a nice thing for mages to play around with (after all, they already have a plethora of summoning spells). That way pure mages can retain some power despite losing one of their better spells. Also, there is already a much underused summoning spell in the 8th spell circle: summon cacofiend. It is my belief the demon summoning spells should be improved before adding another summoning spell (I can't think of a reason anyone would cast them atm). |
|
|
Jun 11 2007, 08:40 AM
Post
#83
|
|
The Tactician Distinguished Developer Posts: 7781 Joined: 1-December 05 |
Quite like the second option(No Ghost Spiders) there for the summoning spell if we have to lose both PI and simul but would really prefer if at least simul could stay. The opportunity for exploitation of simul is very limited as you need some seriously high levels to be able to pull that off. It will be a very small minority of people who choose to abuse it and probabaly not the people improved anvil is aimed at, seems to me removing it is a bit uneccesary plus i like the spell. whereas project image is cheesy and bugged for a large percentage of the game, simlacrum only really becomes an issue right at the end. I wouldn't recommend changing it. I'm persuaded. I will not replace Simulacrum with a new spell. -------------------- Improved Anvil
Cheating is not confined to using external software or the console commands. Abusing the flaws and limitations of the game engine to do something that a human Dungeon Master would not accept or allow is cheating. |
|
|
Jun 11 2007, 01:29 PM
Post
#84
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 68 Joined: 11-April 07 |
It seems to me that removing the PI and simulcrum will make socerers and
mages a lot less usful.I always use PI for before and after battles with buffing and later rod of ressuraction and than destroy them. Since all the monsters have more resistences and to get any sorcerer or mage actually hit something with spells requires few ruby rays,than removing magical defences and than lowering resistence and than hoping that they are not immune to fire/acid/whatever you use. Not sure about the summons instead of simulcrum.The elementals and djinni can be used with the ring or druid. |
|
|
Jun 11 2007, 02:20 PM
Post
#85
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 137 Joined: 11-March 07 |
Hrm yes, losing project image is a big hit for mages, but frankly I'm against mages having infinite amounts of spells.
It will encourage better spell management this way. Imp. tenser's transformation would be cool for bridging the power gap between mages and other classes though. If mages are really crippled by this lastest change, that's the idea I like the best. |
|
|
Jun 11 2007, 03:21 PM
Post
#86
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 68 Joined: 11-April 07 |
Hrm yes, losing project image is a big hit for mages, but frankly I'm against mages having infinite amounts of spells. It will encourage better spell management this way. Imp. tenser's transformation would be cool for bridging the power gap between mages and other classes though. If mages are really crippled by this lastest change, that's the idea I like the best. It's that with all the changes mages(single classed) and sorcerers are not really usful.I'm using Kelsey as a 12 level sorcerer and he is used for buffing,breaching(I have Keldorn too,and F/M/T and a F/T to help with that too because he can't remove defences fast enough). And than mages also have numerous scrolls for back up and contigencies. I'm in chaper 2 and Kelsey hardly helps. Maybe Sikret could make this an optional component or put the new spells in and make it as a matter of a choice to the player if he wants to or not. And that would have to be some serios improved TT since it's a bit hard to imagine casting it and sending him to melee Firkrag,Mellisan or any other boss. About the simulcrum compared to other summons with F/M it gives summon that grows in power with levels and is usful in contrast to Sikret suggestions that will compared to enemies will get weaker and weaker. |
|
|
Jun 11 2007, 03:26 PM
Post
#87
|
|
Premium Member Posts: 305 Joined: 25-February 07 |
Hrm yes, losing project image is a big hit for mages, but frankly I'm against mages having infinite amounts of spells. It will encourage better spell management this way. Imp. tenser's transformation would be cool for bridging the power gap between mages and other classes though. If mages are really crippled by this lastest change, that's the idea I like the best. I generally prefer my mage to be able to cast spells. I have fighters to do the fighting. I also think that the mage would soon die in many battles without the ability to cast PfMW. Even though he could use scrolls, scrolls are in limited supply. Concerning spell management: I generally don't use PI even now, and only if I think I need to. Still, some of the battles are soooo long (due to resistances, spamming of PfMW, etc.) that any thing to extend the number of spells is useful. As reported, I went through several wish spells (maybe 5) during the JD finale trying to get "rest and restore spells" to no avail. |
|
|
Jun 11 2007, 05:14 PM
Post
#88
|
|
Forum Member Tactical reputation: 2 Posts: 442 Joined: 4-May 07 From: London, England |
I think we now have a good balance, replacing PI but keeping Simul. Should remove most of the scope for cheating while not nerfing mages to any great degree for the average palyer.
@Roy: A pure class mage in IA is certainly not useless, they just need to be used slightly differently than in the vanilla game. Both times I've played through i've had a single class mage(Kelsey,Edwin) and they've each been key players. In early game they tend to be good for disabling type spells as well as early acess to improved haste, PfMW, ruby ray and several other key spells. However its later in the game in a few of the improved encounters that you'll be really glad you've got a powerful spell slinger on board, promise. Mages are still very useful in IA just not able to take on the whole world single handed the way they used to be able to. |
|
|
Jun 11 2007, 06:04 PM
Post
#89
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 137 Joined: 11-March 07 |
Atm sikret is striking up the best balance between preventing cheesiness and mage's effectiveness.
I was merely chiming in my support for imp tenser's transformation, if something happens in the future regarding mages and their much-reduced power. As for mages being kept pure spell casters? Well for a start tenser's is already in the game, it's just a worthless spell, and there are plenty of examples of melee-damage spells in infinity engine games and D&D. Mages should have something to do when spells run out. |
|
|
Jun 21 2007, 03:05 PM
Post
#90
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 135 Joined: 21-June 07 |
This isn't a bug but it does annoy me. Could you switch the Mace of Disruption +2's display icon back to the MoD +1's icon? As in the vanilla game, it switches to the icon for a regular Mace +1 after upgrading it. I just hate it because I get paranoid I'll accidentally sell the MoD +2 and not realize it until way later.
Actually, it'd be sweet to add an option to upgrade the mace again to a +3 weapon. It's a fun weapon but sees very little use after the middle game besides to bestow neg plane protection. I think this display problem was fixed by the Improved Items mod so it should be a pretty easy fix. Thanks for all the great work, Sikret. I'm on my first play-through (v.4.2) and the mod has been a blast so far. |
|
|
Jun 21 2007, 03:32 PM
Post
#91
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 137 Joined: 11-March 07 |
This isn't a bug but it does annoy me. Could you switch the Mace of Disruption +2's display icon back to the MoD +1's icon? As in the vanilla game, it switches to the icon for a regular Mace +1 after upgrading it. I just hate it because I get paranoid I'll accidentally sell the MoD +2 and not realize it until way later. Actually, it'd be sweet to add an option to upgrade the mace again to a +3 weapon. It's a fun weapon but sees very little use after the middle game besides to bestow neg plane protection. I think this display problem was fixed by the Improved Items mod so it should be a pretty easy fix. Thanks for all the great work, Sikret. I'm on my first play-through (v.4.2) and the mod has been a blast so far. I agree with this, there are no good maces available before TOB, and about it being ugly when you upgrade. |
|
|
Jun 21 2007, 11:57 PM
Post
#92
|
|
Retired team member Tactical reputation: 2 Posts: 177 Joined: 5-April 06 From: Greece |
Btw the MoD+1 is +3 enhanced and the MoD+2 is +5 enhanced. I think an update in their descriptions is needed. |
|
|
Jul 6 2007, 11:05 PM
Post
#93
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 154 Joined: 8-May 07 From: Germany |
Is it possible to do something about the effects of Haste described here?
http://members.chello.nl/~j.vanthull/BG2SR/Main.htm This post has been edited by Arkain: Jul 6 2007, 11:06 PM |
|
|
Jul 8 2007, 06:42 AM
Post
#94
|
|
The Tactician Distinguished Developer Posts: 7781 Joined: 1-December 05 |
My browser fails to open the link, Arkain!
I'll appreciate if you explain the problem. Chances are that I may have already fixed them in v4.3 however, because I have implemented some fixes regarding haste effects. -------------------- Improved Anvil
Cheating is not confined to using external software or the console commands. Abusing the flaws and limitations of the game engine to do something that a human Dungeon Master would not accept or allow is cheating. |
|
|
Jul 8 2007, 08:43 AM
Post
#95
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 17 Joined: 6-June 07 |
Is it possible to do something about the effects of Haste described here? http://members.chello.nl/~j.vanthull/BG2SR/Main.htm these effects ? QUOTE Hasted characters regenerate at twice normal rate. Combine three Regenerations with haste and regenerate 108 hit points per round.
Hasted characters protected by Blade Barrier or Globe of Blades deal damage every half round instead of every full round. |
|
|
Jul 8 2007, 09:29 AM
Post
#96
|
|
The Tactician Distinguished Developer Posts: 7781 Joined: 1-December 05 |
No, they are not fixable.
What I have fixed are two other things: 1- A hasted characters' doubled movement speed would still stack with the movement bonus of Boots of Speed. I have fixed the boots to make sure that they will not stack and won't result in a character with quadruple speed. 2- Moreover, Improved Haste could still be blocked by Globe of Invulnerability in the vanilla game. I have fixed it. The globe should not block a 6th level spell. -------------------- Improved Anvil
Cheating is not confined to using external software or the console commands. Abusing the flaws and limitations of the game engine to do something that a human Dungeon Master would not accept or allow is cheating. |
|
|
Jul 8 2007, 06:52 PM
Post
#97
|
|
Retired team member Tactical reputation: 2 Posts: 177 Joined: 5-April 06 From: Greece |
Is it possible to do something about the effects of Haste described here? http://members.chello.nl/~j.vanthull/BG2SR/Main.htm If you refer to this: QUOTE Haste only gives you half a bonus attack if you already have an extra half attack per round. then unfortunately it cannot be fixed. |
|
|
Jul 8 2007, 07:18 PM
Post
#98
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 154 Joined: 8-May 07 From: Germany |
Hmm... strange that your browser won't open it. Bah, the link doesn't work as intented anyway... -.- (and now we've learnt: always test links beforehand)
What I was referring to is listed in the "General Spell Info" part: QUOTE Haste sort of doubles the speed at which you "live". While hasted, effects that normally apply once per second now apply once per half second, and AI scripts are executed every half second instead of every full second as well. - Hasted characters take continuous damage twice as often. Watch out for insect swarms, poison, disease and acid. - Hasted characters regenerate at twice normal rate. Combine three Regenerations with haste and regenerate 108 hit points per round. - Hasted characters protected by Blade Barrier or Globe of Blades deal damage every half round instead of every full round. [edit] So these issues are not fixable? Mhm... oh well. On the other hand I remembered something else I read in the spells reference: The original game's GoI blocked Improved Haste... which is interesting as according to the Spells Reference (which is the website to which the link should lead you) Improved Haste is handled differently than a normal 6th level spell: QUOTE This spell has a "power" of only 3, meaning it knocks only three levels off (Minor) Spell Deflection or Turning. This may have been BioWare's intention, since you now cannot destroy a Minor Spell Turning by bouncing one of these off it. I don't know what you changed, but you might take a look at this issue as well, Sikret. [/edit] This post has been edited by Arkain: Jul 8 2007, 09:04 PM |
|
|
Jul 9 2007, 07:53 PM
Post
#99
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 18 Joined: 9-May 07 |
Mages seem to use their sequencers/triggers even when unconscious/stunned/etc.
|
|
|
Jul 10 2007, 05:24 AM
Post
#100
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 53 Joined: 13-June 07 From: Adelaide, Australia |
...Or when they have a protection from magic scroll on them (this one is probably a bit of a cheese tactic...I haven't saved after doing this one)
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 5th November 2024 - 04:56 AM |