Bug reports Options

[Seewead]

Edit: SOLVED

Concerning: Rjali Version 8.0

Description: Install-process aborted with errors

Here the abstract of my setup-rjali.debug:


"WeiDU v 24000 Log

Setup-rjali.exe --no-exit-pause --noautoupdate --language 0 --skip-at-view --force-install-list 2 3 --logapp
[.\chitin.key] loaded, 875812 bytes
[.\chitin.key] 187 BIFFs, 62160 resources
[.\engine.lua] loaded, 104 bytes
[.\weidu.conf] loaded, 17 bytes
[.\lang\de_de\dialog.tlk] 164087 string entries
[.\lang\de_de\dialogf.tlk] 164087 string entries
Using Language [English]
[English] has 1 top-level TRA files
[Rjali/Languages/English/setup.tra] has 373 translation strings

...
[mega-long wall of text]
...

[BRJFAY.DLG] loaded
[./override/BG#TYRIS.DLG] loaded, 52305 bytes
[BG#TYRIS.DLG] loaded
[./override/BRJFAY25.DLG] loaded, 9110 bytes
[BRJFAY25.DLG] loaded

ERROR locating resource for 'CHAIN3'
Resource [BG#TYS25.DLG] not found in KEY file:
[./chitin.key]
ERROR: preprocessing APPEND_EARLY [Rjali/Dialogue/SOA/RJTYRI/RJBFAY.d]: Failure("resource [BG#TYS25.DLG] not found for 'CHAIN3'")

Stopping installation because of error.
Stopping installation because of error.
Stopping installation because of error.

ERROR Installing [Rjali Romance Mod (BG2EE:SoA & TOB NPC) created by nullset], rolling back to previous state
Unable to Unlink [Rjali/Backup/3/OTHER.3]: Unix.Unix_error(1, "unlink", "Rjali/Backup/3/OTHER.3")
Will uninstall 976 files for [RJALI/SETUP-RJALI.TP2] component 3.
Restoring backed-up [Rjali/Backup/3/GTIMES.IDS]

...
[wall of text - restoring]
...

Uninstalled 976 files for [RJALI/SETUP-RJALI.TP2] component 3.
Unable to Unlink [Rjali/Backup/3/READLN.3]: Unix.Unix_error(20, "unlink", "Rjali/Backup/3/READLN.3")
Unable to Unlink [Rjali/Backup/3/READLN.3.TEXT]: Unix.Unix_error(20, "unlink", "Rjali/Backup/3/READLN.3.TEXT")
SETUP-WEIDU.TP2 0 0 Installed
SETUP-BWS.TP2 0 0 Installed
BG2EETP\LANGUAGES\DE_DE\SETUP-BG2EETP-DE_DE.TP2 0 0 Installed
BG2EE_GA/SETUP-BG2EE_GA.TP2 0 0 Installed
SETUP-AMBER.TP2 1 0 Installed
SETUP-AMBER.TP2 1 1 Installed
FADE/SETUP-FADE.TP2 0 0 Installed
FADE/SETUP-FADE.TP2 0 1 Installed
FADE/SETUP-FADE.TP2 0 2 Installed
NINDE/NINDE.TP2 0 0 Installed
SAERILETH/SETUP-SAERILETH.TP2 1 0 Installed
SKIE/SETUP-SKIE.TP2 1 0 Installed
TYRISFLARE/SETUP-TYRISFLARE.TP2 0 0 Installed
YVETTE/SETUP-YVETTE.TP2 0 0 Installed
ISRA_BG2/ISRA_BG2.TP2 0 0 Installed
DEARNISE/SETUP-DEARNISE.TP2 0 0 Installed
SETUP-BANTERPACK.TP2 2 0 Installed
SETUP-BANTERPACK.TP2 2 1 Installed
SETUP-BANTERPACK.TP2 2 2 Installed
SETUP-BANTERPACK.TP2 2 3 Installed
IEPBANTERS/SETUP-IEPBANTERS.TP2 1 0 Installed
IMOENROMANCE/SETUP-IMOENROMANCE.TP2 0 0 Installed
IMOENROMANCE/SETUP-IMOENROMANCE.TP2 0 1 Installed
BRANWEN/SETUP-BRANWEN.TP2 0 0 Installed
TASHIA/SETUP-TASHIA.TP2 0 0 Installed
TASHIA/SETUP-TASHIA.TP2 0 2 Installed
SETUP-NPCFLIRT.TP2 2 0 Installed
SETUP-NPCFLIRT.TP2 2 2 Installed
SETUP-NPCFLIRT.TP2 2 4 Installed
SETUP-NPCFLIRT.TP2 2 6 Installed
SETUP-NPCFLIRT.TP2 2 8 Installed
SETUP-NPCFLIRT.TP2 2 10 Installed
RE/SETUP-RE.TP2 0 0 Installed

...
[more RE/Setup]
...

RE/SETUP-RE.TP2 0 54 Installed
RJALI/SETUP-RJALI.TP2 0 2 Installed ~Mod Timing A Lot Faster~
ERROR: Failure("resource [BG#TYS25.DLG] not found for 'CHAIN3'")
PLEASE email the file SETUP-RJALI.DEBUG to nullset@sympatico.ca
Automatically Skipping [Rjali Romance Mod (BG2EE:SoA & TOB NPC) created by nullset] because of error."


Dear Nullset: Could you please help?

Thanks a lot, Seewead

This post has been edited by Seewead: May 9 2017, 08:40 AM

[Seewead]

Before I call it a day, let me once get back to

K.5

K5 - Changing the SoA group banter from sleep to auto-fire. The conditions are: party of 6; at least 3 romances in party; area = keep audience hall; Bodhi dead; and have had Daleson dialogue.

1.
I would like you to remind, that there are plenty of players, who do not tend to travel with a full group of 6 persons, but like to use smaller parties for reasons of challenge. Well, everybody his own play-style. But these people would never get to the group-banters of your mod, unfortunately.

2.
And strictly speaking from my own perspective: I would have never gone to Bodhi right away after Underdark. Instead it was very important to me, to get back to my Keep and spend time with my loved ones. Yes, from an in-game-perspective time is of the essence to get back our souls. But from a meta-view I know, that I have all the time of the world. So I am usually not rushing to Bodhi. During my current playthrough that led to the unpleasant incident, that I had to wait for my first group-banter far to long (117 days, see above). If I may suggest this: Strike this condition of Bodhi beeing dead. I know, I am not the only one.

See you in a couple of weeks, Seewead

[nullset]

Before I call it a day, let me once get back to

K.5

K5 - Changing the SoA group banter from sleep to auto-fire. The conditions are: party of 6; at least 3 romances in party; area = keep audience hall; Bodhi dead; and have had Daleson dialogue.

1.
I would like you to remind, that there are plenty of players, who do not tend to travel with a full group of 6 persons, but like to use smaller parties for reasons of challenge. Well, everybody his own play-style. But these people would never get to the group-banters of your mod, unfortunately.

2.
And strictly speaking from my own perspective: I would have never gone to Bodhi right away after Underdark. Instead it was very important to me, to get back to my Keep and spend time with my loved ones. Yes, from an in-game-perspective time is of the essence to get back our souls. But from a meta-view I know, that I have all the time of the world. So I am usually not rushing to Bodhi. During my current playthrough that led to the unpleasant incident, that I had to wait for my first group-banter far to long (117 days, see above). If I may suggest this: Strike this condition of Bodhi beeing dead. I know, I am not the only one.

See you in a couple of weeks, Seewead

1. OK. Gonna have to test this thoroughly, but setting it back to a requirement that there be at least 4 in the party of which at least three must be romanced. Can't do better than that. Group chat with less than three makes no sense and, in the 1st group chat, I cannot assume that anybody is parked. Any advance beyond this involves more complexity than I am willing to deal with, so don't ask.

2. Nope. Won't do it. The object here was to ensure that Imoen had a fair shot at being romanced before the 1st group chat. I have even considered requiring that Imoen be romanced (if she can be romanced). The banter gets a little wierd if she is in the party and not romanced. Otherwise, I have to rework the banter to cover more options. I might just have to do that at some point, but it is a fairly major project.