![]() |
The Black Wyrm's Lair Terms of Use |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ![]() Premium Member Posts: 663 Joined: 9-June 08 From: Budapest, Hungary ![]() |
I started a new party because I was a little bit tired and bored with the previous one. My previous party was a usual IA party: sorcerer protagonist + barbarian + blade + ranger->cleric (dual) + cleric/mage (multi) + monk. I will surely continue my old game later on but at the moment I concentrate on the new party. Ok, so this is the new party composation (and their current statistics):
Protagonist: Lothar, a half-elf Vagrant: Chaotic Good; lvl 9th; Axe++, Flail++, Club++, two-weapon style+++ Barbie, the half-ork barbarian (he is a male! ![]() Ince, the Inquisitor: Lawful Good; lvl 9th; 2H Sword++, Halberd++, Quater Staff+, 2H weapon style++ Rancle, the Ranger->Cleric (dual class): Neutral Good; lvl 7/9th; War Hammer++, Club++, Flail++, Mace++, Quater Staff+, two-weapon style+++ Berti, the Berserker->Thief (dual): Chaotic Neutral; lvl 9/10th; Long Sword++, Scimitar+, Short Sword+, Dagger+, Club++, Dart+, two-weapon style+++ Cernd, the Auramaster: True Neutral; lvl 11th; Scimitar+, Dagger+, Quater Staff+, Sling+ Yes, there is no arcane caster at all! And there will be no arcane caster in the future as well. I will replace sometimes Cernd with other NPCs to trigger their quest but not arcane caster NPC. That was my intention from the beginning and it is a concept and not an accident. ![]() I think in a lot of cases it will make my life harder but some battles will be easier. Also I do not have to prebuff as much because I am not able to do as much prebuff as with an arcane caster. ![]() ![]() I will write here my experience with this party as I advance in the game. I will update my second post here (so, not this one). I will write it from the viewpoint of Lothar. Btw, I have no idea how I was able to find such a name. Lothar. In the other cases I think the naming logic is clear. ![]() Ps. Sorry for my not so good English! I hope it would be still enjoyable. Update: Part 1 is finished Part 2 is finished Part 3 is finished Part 4 is partially entered This post has been edited by Vuki: Sep 1 2008, 09:33 AM -------------------- History of my party in IA can be seen here!
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Forum Member Tactical reputation: 1 Posts: 266 Joined: 15-July 08 ![]() |
I don't think that it's possible to get JD without some magery in party. FoD&W is also a "hard to get" item. I dunno how you can battle dragons and some other tough monsters without mages. Mithril golem? Without imp.haste? No tnx. Inqusitors are cool at high levels, but don't expect miracles early in the game from them. I think even Cernd at high levels (ruby ray) won't contribute much without breach spells.
Party thief will probably have to use scrolls a lot when he gets UAI. Even early quests improved monsters such as Torgal will be very hard without a regular haste at least. Greater yuan-ti even worse perhaps. I am interested how it will go anyway. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() ![]() Premium Member Posts: 663 Joined: 9-June 08 From: Budapest, Hungary ![]() |
Even early quests improved monsters such as Torgal will be very hard without a regular haste at least. Greater yuan-ti even worse perhaps. Hmm, I still haven't fighted against Tor'gal with this party but I beated Tazok and I think he is also very strong (even he is of course not as strong as Tor'gal). That was my party when I beated him: Vagrant: 10. szint (=level - just for Baronius ![]() Barbarian: 11. Ranger->Cleric: 7/11 Inquisitor: 10 Berserker->Thief: 9/12 Auramaster (Cernd): 12 I was able to beat him without any cheesy method. I did not use any haste (not even with potion), I just used some buffing spells (chant, bless, draw upon holy might, ...). I will update my walkthrough soon and you can find there more details. This post has been edited by Vuki: Aug 24 2008, 05:17 PM -------------------- History of my party in IA can be seen here!
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th June 2025 - 07:53 AM |