![]() |
The Black Wyrm's Lair Terms of Use |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 6 Joined: 8-February 07 ![]() |
Maybe someone played them together? What about their comptability?
This post has been edited by Koriatus: Mar 9 2008, 12:11 AM |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 207 Joined: 5-October 04 ![]() |
Would you happen to know/have a list of which of the priest/druid spells I listed in my earlier post would be affected by
QUOTE 1- We are not merely concerned with the changes IA has applied to spell x (itself), we are also concerned about the changes IA has applied to other spells and creatures in regard to spell x. When you copy spell x and rename it, you successfully keep all the changes IA has applied to spell x (itself), but if spell y is also tweaked by IA to grant immunity to spell x, immunity to your new spell will not be added to it (or to creature z who is immune to spell x). I'd rather not have to dig into the guts of each and every spell in IA to see which of the ones on the list would actually be affected by this situation. About point 2, I'm not entirely sure what the issue is here. Does the detectable spells component of IA require a very specific set of spells, and wouldn't this make IA incompatible with any mod that introduces a new spell (or spell-like ability) unless extra steps were taken. This is sounding more like Total Conversion type territory. I hope you don't mind if I ask others to see if I can hear some more opinions on that issues since it sounds like something that could be very major for any mod with semi-intelligent scripting. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st April 2025 - 07:25 AM |