The Black Wyrm Lair Forums
The Black Wyrm's Lair Terms of Use Help Search Members Calendar

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Bonus for 2 handed weapons
Mongerman
post Jan 24 2008, 01:29 PM
Post #1





Forum Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 14-October 06




I'm thinking of playing through IA 5 again after a long break, and I'm wondering whether its a good idea to give a 1.5x str bonus to 2 handed weapons as per IWD2 rules.

1) Its makes more sense. You are swinging it with 2 hands afterall
2) More incentive to use 2 handed weapons. Currently, there is no incentive at all, since dual wielding gives extra attack and more weapon bonuses

Anyway, its good to be back. I'll be starting a IA5 game when time permits

Regards
Mongerman
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
luan
post Jan 24 2008, 02:04 PM
Post #2





Forum Member
Posts: 100
Joined: 25-April 07




Well you do get double the critical rate with the two handed weapon style though a 1.5x str bonus would be great to help balance against dual wielding.
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Ryel ril Ers
post Jan 25 2008, 01:55 PM
Post #3





Forum Member
Posts: 178
Joined: 24-May 07
From: Budapest, Hungary




Don't forget the whirwind attack. The bonus to critical not too powerful because the helmet protect it. I dont think the 1.5x str bonus is not good idea because it means bonus thaco too. I think add bonus damage to the the weapon style.
The two handed weapons are very powerful in IA so doesn't necessery improved it.


--------------------
My experiences in IA 5.0
PART I updated: 2008.08.06.

Hungarian water polo history
God bless our boys and rest in peace György Kolonics!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
coaster
post Jan 25 2008, 07:18 PM
Post #4





Forum Member
Posts: 61
Joined: 16-April 07




Does the increased critical range bonus (19-20 critical for two handed weapons) stack with the riskbreaker's increased critical range (17-20) making the range 16-20? If so, a riskbreaker getting criticals every one in four hits would be extremely powerful.
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Arkain
post Jan 25 2008, 08:55 PM
Post #5





Forum Member
Posts: 154
Joined: 8-May 07
From: Germany




Edited again. Actually it wasn't a pointless posting. D'oh.

...

http://forums.blackwyrmlair.net/index.php?showtopic=1811

QUOTE
============
Disadvantages:
============
- Cannot wear any armor.
- Cannot wear any helmet (other than Ioun stones).
- Cannot use gauntlets and shields.
- Cannot use ranged weapons.

- Cannot specialize in two handed weapons.
- Receives a -2 Penalty to constitution.
- Is immune to "Spirit Armor" and "Barkskin" spells.
- Requires 13 Dexterity and 12 Intelligence.
- Cannot dual class.


This includes not only that he won't be a good fighter with two handed weapons, but it also excludes the appropiate weapon style, I just looked it up ingame.

This post has been edited by Arkain: Jan 25 2008, 09:00 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
coaster
post Jan 25 2008, 11:46 PM
Post #6





Forum Member
Posts: 61
Joined: 16-April 07




Shame, but thanks for the info smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
luan
post Jan 26 2008, 01:18 AM
Post #7





Forum Member
Posts: 100
Joined: 25-April 07




The riskbreaker could go for the single weapon style to get a wider critical range with the JD sword :X

A flat bonus damage for 2 handed weapon style might be nice.

1 pip +3 damage, 2 pips +6 damage
Just an idea...
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Mongerman
post Jan 26 2008, 08:04 AM
Post #8





Forum Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 14-October 06




QUOTE(luan @ Jan 26 2008, 01:18 AM) *
The riskbreaker could go for the single weapon style to get a wider critical range with the JD sword :X

A flat bonus damage for 2 handed weapon style might be nice.

1 pip +3 damage, 2 pips +6 damage
Just an idea...



That would work too, since +6 dmg is just slightly less then half 18/00 str dmg. My point is, other then availibility of weapons, there is absolutely no reason to use a 2 handed weapon atm. Dmg wise, dual wielding wins. Bonus from weapons, 2 weapons are again better then one. And using a shield allows AC and defensive bonuses.
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Ryel ril Ers
post Jan 26 2008, 10:58 AM
Post #9





Forum Member
Posts: 178
Joined: 24-May 07
From: Budapest, Hungary




I see my manual and the 18/00 strength grants only +3 thaco and +6 damage the 25 strength grants +7 thaco and +14 damage so the +3 and +6 damage bonus seems good.


--------------------
My experiences in IA 5.0
PART I updated: 2008.08.06.

Hungarian water polo history
God bless our boys and rest in peace György Kolonics!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Raven
post Jan 26 2008, 11:36 AM
Post #10



Group Icon

Senior Mod Tester
Tactical reputation: 4
Posts: 1112
Joined: 27-March 07
From: UK




QUOTE(Mongerman @ Jan 26 2008, 08:04 AM) *
That would work too, since +6 dmg is just slightly less then half 18/00 str dmg. My point is, other then availibility of weapons, there is absolutely no reason to use a 2 handed weapon atm. Dmg wise, dual wielding wins. Bonus from weapons, 2 weapons are again better then one. And using a shield allows AC and defensive bonuses.


The idea of granting damage bonuses for the two-handed proficiency is a good one but I don't think the damage bonus should be any more than +1/+2. I think +3/+6 is too much; a character with a two-handed weapon and GWW would be too powerful.
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
luan
post Jan 26 2008, 01:23 PM
Post #11





Forum Member
Posts: 100
Joined: 25-April 07




+60 extra potential damage on GWW does sounds pretty high. Perhaps +2/4, is more appropriate, I was just throwing ideas out there smile.gif

However consider that improved haste for dual weilding is 2 extra attacks that can easily be 60 damage (especially with critical strike). You also gain very important stat bonuses (JD, FoDW, Blackrazor, Crom F) albiet with a lower threat range.

I think someone with a huge 2handed weapon *should* be scary. Just as is someone with dual weild and 8x attacks per round!
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Arkain
post Jan 27 2008, 07:53 PM
Post #12





Forum Member
Posts: 154
Joined: 8-May 07
From: Germany




... assuming you hit everytime. Personally If at all I only choose a few GWWs for those two handed weapon fighters who cannot place more than two profiency points into a weapon, for example Keldorn. As you "only" have 5-6 attacks per round with Improved Haste (without or with the gauntlets adding 1/2 attack per round) it seems to be a good choice. On the other hand you need to hit. If I could have like 100 attacks per round they would be useless if I only hit on a critical hit. Therefore I like Critical Strike more. No matter whether I have 5 attacks, or 10: they all hit and that's quite likely the most important thing to consider for a warrior type, imho.

This post has been edited by Arkain: Jan 27 2008, 07:54 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Sikret
post Jan 28 2008, 07:30 AM
Post #13


The Tactician
Group Icon

Distinguished Developer
Posts: 7793
Joined: 1-December 05




QUOTE(coaster @ Jan 25 2008, 11:48 PM) *
Does the increased critical range bonus (19-20 critical for two handed weapons) stack with the riskbreaker's increased critical range (17-20) making the range 16-20? If so, a riskbreaker getting criticals every one in four hits would be extremely powerful.


Riskbreakers can't put any stars in Two handed Weapon Style (this disadvantage exists even in the current version, it was just missed in the kit's description and should be added for the next release).

@Arkain

The link you had given was to the old Riskbreaker kit (v8). The v9 description can be found in IA's readme. Disadvantages are the same though.



--------------------
Improved Anvil




Cheating is not confined to using external software or the console commands. Abusing the flaws and limitations of the game engine to do something that a human Dungeon Master would not accept or allow is cheating.
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Arkain
post Jan 29 2008, 01:20 PM
Post #14





Forum Member
Posts: 154
Joined: 8-May 07
From: Germany




I know, but as the disadvantages are the same I thought it might be nice to give some source.
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th April 2025 - 06:10 PM