| The Black Wyrm's Lair Terms of Use |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
Apr 3 2008, 04:40 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Premium Member Posts: 305 Joined: 25-February 07 |
So which is better for your primary caster in IA, a sorcerer or a wizard?
I think that the wildmage is the most powerful arcane caster, even though I would never use him in a no-reload game. The wildmage does have a significant disadvantage though. The reckless dwoemers some times give bad results even with chaos shields. Occasionally, bad things can happen when casting other spells too. But most of the time, I feel like I am taking unfair advantage when using a wildmage. Because of the chaotic nature of the wildmage, some people disregard him as a tool for the tactician. So, whether you think he is too powerful or too risky, please don’t consider the wildmage in this comparison. In the unmodded game, the sorcerer can nuke the opposition through various tactics, even with his limited spell selection; however, the “nuke” has generally been dismantled in IA to allow greater challenge. The arcane caster generally can no longer decimate an entire group of enemies in 1-4 rounds. Now, I am thinking that knowing more spells than a sorcerer is allowed can be helpful. In IA, metagaming allows you to select just the right spells to succeed in each battle. As a specialist, you can get a similar number of spells to the sorcerer. The wizard is also great for setting up contingencies, and choosing other spells that you may want to know just once. The power to dual is also a great advantage to allow more HP to withstand area of effect spells and better your THAC0, saves, etc. For these reasons, the wizard may be superior to the sorcerer. We are all aware that the sorcerer also has strengths. Which do you prefer as your primary caster (sorcerer, wizard, dual class wizard), and why do you think your choice is best? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Apr 11 2008, 01:10 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Premium Member Posts: 305 Joined: 25-February 07 |
Well, I must be getting the swing of things, because I agree with Sikret - who really knows what he is doing.
On the other hand, I always play a sorcerer, and I'm about ready for something different. I am contemplating a fighter-mage multiclass, berserker 9-mage (primary spell caster), and blade as my arcane powers. It would be nice if the berserker 9-mage was twinked liked Edwin (amulet) or Nalia (improved ring). I don't think this is the most powerful combination, but I think this group will be successful, provide an interesting game, and be a change from my typical team. In my current game, I'm running a sorcerer, blade, and conjurer as my arcane; they are a very powerful group. It most closely matches Sikret's #3 choice as the blade is currently superior to a FM in some ways while inferior in others. This post has been edited by rbeverjr: Apr 11 2008, 01:14 PM |
|
|
|
rbeverjr Sorcerer or wizard Apr 3 2008, 04:40 PM
rbeverjr Many people have read, but no one cares to venture... Apr 4 2008, 02:23 PM
Sikret I still hope that some players will venture their ... Apr 10 2008, 06:55 PM
Moongaze Many people have read, but no one cares to venture... Apr 11 2008, 06:41 AM
Baronius Most members of BWL are busy => many forums are... Apr 11 2008, 10:52 AM
shadan Although sorcerer is a better than a single class ... Apr 11 2008, 11:30 AM
Raven Although sorcerer is a better than a single class ... Apr 11 2008, 12:24 PM
Frazurblu Another possibility for a magic heavy party using ... Apr 11 2008, 03:17 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th February 2026 - 11:31 AM |