| The Black Wyrm's Lair Terms of Use |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
Dec 26 2007, 05:33 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 99 Joined: 6-November 07 |
I know the Sorcerer is a totally bad-ass spellcaster, and with spells like Project Image can beat just about anything in the game, but is a Sorcerer a better character than a dual classed Mage who begins as a Thief (for a few skills, like dealing with locks and traps when not casting) or as a Fighter (who has a lot of HP to play with as well as the ability to fire a longbow when spells run out) or even a Cleric (who will still have more HP than a Mage as well as some very different magicks to play with)?
Let the debate begin! -------------------- Baruk Khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!
Your ass will be laminated -Dyslexia of Borg Haikus are easy But they don't always make sense Refrigerator |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 18 2008, 09:24 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Forum Member Posts: 178 Joined: 24-May 07 From: Budapest, Hungary |
@Klorox
Try the wild mage! He is the most powerful face in the vanilla game! You able to cast 6+ spell in the beginning of the game, you have chance to get some nice item from wild surges (i get an Abid Alzem Horrid Wilting) lots of wild surges better then you cast the original spell like the party completely heal or your spells return. There are bad effects but the adventages are more better then the disadventages. -------------------- My experiences in IA 5.0
PART I updated: 2008.08.06. Hungarian water polo history God bless our boys and rest in peace György Kolonics!!! |
|
|
|
Klorox I know Sorcerers are usually deemed the king of arcane spellchuckers, but how do they compare to dual classed Mages? Dec 26 2007, 05:33 AM
Ryel ril Ers The wild mage equal caster with the sorc, but more... Jan 13 2008, 07:15 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 03:23 AM |