![]() |
The Black Wyrm's Lair Terms of Use |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ![]() Mod Developer Posts: 210 Joined: 3-December 05 ![]() |
Hello,
Players use strenght bonus for melee weapons. What about monsters? I know bonus is applying for claw's type weapon, but for bite? I have looked into many monsters in BG2, and some does have it, some doesn't. For example, greater basilisk have 3 attack: - petrification - claw with poison (with strenght bonus) - bite (no strenght bonus) What do you think about that? This post has been edited by aigleborgne: Dec 18 2005, 05:41 PM |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() ![]() Mod Developer Posts: 210 Joined: 3-December 05 ![]() |
Thanks for all responses.
It was very interesting to read you ![]() Yes, I agree with Rabain. Strenght is necessary and more realistic. In case of a claw, compare 2 monsters: Black bear and Polar bear, they should have a similar claw. But polar bear is more stronger, bigger, and so should inflict more damage. I have never doubt about this in fact ![]() About bite, it's more difficult to say. Since I have to review all monsters for my mod, I am not sure if I have to apply or not the strenght bonus. I will do my best. Thanks again! |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th August 2025 - 11:07 AM |