![]() |
The Black Wyrm's Lair Terms of Use |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ![]() Mod Developer Posts: 210 Joined: 3-December 05 ![]() |
Hello,
Players use strenght bonus for melee weapons. What about monsters? I know bonus is applying for claw's type weapon, but for bite? I have looked into many monsters in BG2, and some does have it, some doesn't. For example, greater basilisk have 3 attack: - petrification - claw with poison (with strenght bonus) - bite (no strenght bonus) What do you think about that? This post has been edited by aigleborgne: Dec 18 2005, 05:41 PM |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() GOD Retired team member Posts: 1728 Joined: 14-July 04 From: Ireland ![]() |
Not that all cre files are perfect or anything throughout the IE games but the above example at least makes sense.
I don't think a basilisk bite should have a strength bonus unless basilisks are known for having particularly strong bites The claw should as the basilisk can put the force of its body behind a swing (it is much harder to put bodily force behind a bite). On the other hand I would expect creatures such as the Sauhagin or Kua-toa to have powerful bites if they chose that form of attack. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th August 2025 - 11:03 AM |